condition flags USE in AD instruct

[Tom Rodriguez]

On Apr 14, 2009, at 11:07 AM, Tom Rodriguez wrote:

> What's it look like?  You can USE something that isn't mentioned in  
> the match rule.  A USE has to an

                            ^can't
tom

> input to the underlying MachNode and if it's not mentioned in the  
> match rule then it's not an input.
>
> tom
>
> On Apr 14, 2009, at 11:05 AM, Christian Thalinger wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 2009-04-14 at 10:45 -0700, Tom Rodriguez wrote:
>>> It might be a case of too string error checking.  If you have a  
>>> match
>>> rule then all the USE and DEF effects are taken care of and I don't
>>> think it would complain about USEing that flags.  Are you going to
>>> have a match rule on the instruct or are you writing an instruct for
>>> use in an expand rule?
>>
>> A match rule on the instruct.  This is the ADDC.
>>
>> -- Christian
>>
>