review request (S) 6866585 debug code in ciObjectFactory too slow

[John Coomes]

Tom Rodriguez (Thomas.Rodriguez at Sun.COM) wrote:
> Sure.

Ok.  I've updated the webrev at

	http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jcoomes/6866585-ci-debug/

so the loops over the _ci_objects array in get() and insert() are all
under control of the globals.hpp var CIObjectFactoryVerify.

-John

> On Aug 7, 2009, at 1:04 PM, John Coomes wrote:
> 
> > John Rose (John.Rose at Sun.COM) wrote:
> >> On Aug 6, 2009, at 2:15 PM, John Coomes wrote:
> >>
> >>> In the short-term, I just want to be able to check in my test case.
> >>> How about if I restore the debugging code, but put it under  
> >>> control of
> >>> the CIObjectFactoryVerify option?
> >>>
> >>> I'll also file a bug to capture the comments.
> >>
> >> Good.  I very much like Tom/Keith/Ramki's suggestions of simplifying
> >> the code and reducing perm. distinctions.
> >
> > I interpret this as you're ok with putting the debugging code under
> > control of the option for now, as long as I capture the discussion in
> > a bug so it gets fixed properly.  Tom, you didn't like the idea much.
> > Since John is willing to fix it properly--are you ok with it now?
> >
> >> This internal CI simplification is a natural add-on to my
> >> nonperm-6863023 work.  Shall I roll it in, or make a separate bug?
> >
> > I'd think of your reviewers--what would be easier for them?  IMHO,
> > smaller is usually better.
> >
> > -John
> >
>