review (XS) for 6921992: failure in verify scheduling after 6792161

[Tom Rodriguez]

Yes we can live without the fix though I think we need to fix it at some point.  I'm going to push this to hotspot/hotspot first since these changes just were pushed up and I'd prefer the failure not to propagate out further.

tom

On Feb 4, 2010, at 10:48 AM, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:

> Changes look good.
> 
> Tom, was 679216 case rare? Can we live without the fix?
> 
> Thanks,
> Vladimir
> 
> Tom Rodriguez wrote:
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~never/6921992
>> 6921992: failure in verify scheduling after 6792161
>> Reviewed-by:
>> The fix for 6792161 created problems with the scheduler verification
>> logic so until I find a better for 6792161 I'm backing it out.  This
>> is just an anti-delta for the original fix.
>> src/share/vm/opto/ifg.cpp
>> The previous changeset was http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/hotspot-comp/hotspot/rev/0e14bd797dad