Review Request: Add fast bytecode support to C++ interpreter

[Tom Rodriguez]

This will go in as 6939845.  http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~never/6939845

tom

On Mar 31, 2010, at 11:32 AM, Edward Nevill wrote:

> On Wed, 2010-03-31 at 11:01 -0700, Tom Rodriguez wrote:
>> I think that makes sense.  So this isn't really adding support for fast bytecodes but providing a fallback path for a system with two different interpreters, one which supports fast bytecodes and one which doesn't.  I think it would be best to keep this ifdef ZERO.  What about this:
>> 
> 
> Correct. I am happy with your proposed modifications.
> 
> Regards,
> Ed.
> 
>