[Fwd: Re: Performance of locally copied members ?]

[David Holmes]

Thanks Tom.

Tom Rodriguez said the following on 05/04/10 09:21:
> Client doesn't perform loop invariant code motion so caching by hand will certainly make a difference for hot loops.

Is this a feasible improvement for C1?

David

> tom
> 
> On May 3, 2010, at 3:21 PM, David Holmes wrote:
> 
>> Compiler folks, do we know what exactly C1 is not doing in this scenario?
>>
>> People should not have to do this kind of optimization at the Java  level.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> David Holmes
>> <Re: Performance of locally copied members ?.eml>
>