[Fwd: Re: Performance of locally copied members ?]

[Tom Rodriguez]

It's feasible, except that no one is working on C1 performance.

tom

On May 3, 2010, at 5:03 PM, David Holmes wrote:

> Thanks Tom.
> 
> Tom Rodriguez said the following on 05/04/10 09:21:
>> Client doesn't perform loop invariant code motion so caching by hand will certainly make a difference for hot loops.
> 
> Is this a feasible improvement for C1?
> 
> David
> 
>> tom
>> On May 3, 2010, at 3:21 PM, David Holmes wrote:
>>> Compiler folks, do we know what exactly C1 is not doing in this scenario?
>>> 
>>> People should not have to do this kind of optimization at the Java  level.
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> David Holmes
>>> <Re: Performance of locally copied members ?.eml>