review (S) for 6982370: SIGBUS in jbyte_fill
Vladimir Kozlov
vladimir.kozlov at oracle.com
Fri Sep 3 14:37:00 PDT 2010
Good.
Vladimir
Tom Rodriguez wrote:
> Thanks. I've updated the webrev and rerun the test.
>
> tom
>
> On Sep 3, 2010, at 1:25 PM, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
>
>> Tom Rodriguez wrote:
>>>> Could you use shifts?:
>>>>
>>>> __ sllx(O3, 60, O3);
>>>> __ srlx(O3, 60, O3);
>>> Yep. You mean 48 don't you?
>> Yes, sorry mmy mistake.
>>
>>>> instead of:
>>>>
>>>> 1641 __ set(0xffff, O3); << 2 instructions
>>>> 1642 __ and3(value, O3, value);
>>>>
>>>> Tom, sorry I don't like your changes which increase the code.
>>> The normal path doesn't have to split the loads since it knows they are aligned so it seems like a waste to emit extra stores there just so it can be used in the case where it's very small. I could consolidate the slow path more but I don't want to make the main path slower.
>> OK, I got it. Now I agree with your code. It is good to go.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Vladimir
>>
>>> tom
>>>> How about this:
>>>>
>>>> __ BIND(L_fill_4_bytes);
>>>> __ brx(Assembler::zero, false, Assembler::pt, L_fill_2_bytes);
>>>> if (t == T_BYTE || t == T_SHORT) {
>>>> __ delayed()->andcc(count, 1<<(shift-1), G0);
>>>> + if (t == T_SHORT) {
>>>> + __ sth(value, to, 0);
>>>> + __ sth(value, to, 2);
>>>> + } else {
>>>> + __ stb(value, to, 0);
>>>> + __ stb(value, to, 1);
>>>> + __ stb(value, to, 2);
>>>> + __ stb(value, to, 3);
>>>> + }
>>>> } else {
>>>> __ delayed()->nop();
>>>> + __ stw(value, to, 0);
>>>> }
>>>> - __ stw(value, to, 0);
>>>> if (t == T_BYTE || t == T_SHORT) {
>>>> __ inc(to, 4);
>>>> // fill trailing 2 bytes
>>>> __ andcc(count, 1<<(shift-1), G0); // in delay slot of branches
>>>> __ BIND(L_fill_2_bytes);
>>>> __ brx(Assembler::zero, false, Assembler::pt, L_fill_byte);
>>>> __ delayed()->andcc(count, 1, count);
>>>> - __ sth(value, to, 0);
>>>> if (t == T_BYTE) {
>>>> + __ stb(value, to, 0);
>>>> + __ stb(value, to, 1);
>>>> __ inc(to, 2);
>>>> // fill trailing byte
>>>> __ andcc(count, 1, count); // in delay slot of branches
>>>> __ BIND(L_fill_byte);
>>>> __ brx(Assembler::zero, false, Assembler::pt, L_exit);
>>>> __ delayed()->nop();
>>>> __ stb(value, to, 0);
>>>> } else {
>>>> + __ sth(value, to, 0);
>>>> __ BIND(L_fill_byte);
>>>> }
>>>> } else {
>>>> __ BIND(L_fill_2_bytes);
>>>> }
>>>> __ BIND(L_exit);
>>>>
>>>> Vladimir
>>>>
>>>> Tom Rodriguez wrote:
>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~never/6982370
>>>>> 6982370: SIGBUS in jbyte_fill
>>>>> Summary:
>>>>> Reviewed-by:
>>>>> In the new fill routines copy less than 8 bytes long skip over the
>>>>> main code and go the final cleanup stage. On sparc this isn't right
>>>>> since it still hasn't accounted for alignment. The fix is to have a
>>>>> special path for handling that. The code doesn't crash on 32 bit
>>>>> sparc because handling of misaligned stores seems to be enabled.
>>>>> Additionally I noticed a problem with the logic for clearing the high
>>>>> bits of a short value. The logic I wrote works correctly for clean
>>>>> ints but doesn't work for 64 bit signed extended ints resulting in
>>>>> invalid fill values in some cases. Tested with failing nightly and
>>>>> new test case to exercise the various alignments.
>
More information about the hotspot-compiler-dev
mailing list