Request for reviews (M): 7079329: Adjust allocation prefetching for T4
Christian Thalinger
christian.thalinger at oracle.com
Tue Aug 16 08:48:34 PDT 2011
On Aug 16, 2011, at 5:01 PM, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
> On 8/16/11 2:29 AM, Christian Thalinger wrote:
>>
>> On Aug 16, 2011, at 3:12 AM, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
>>
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kvn/7079329/webrev
>>>
>>> 7079329: Adjust allocation prefetching for T4
>>>
>>> L2 cache line size is 32 bytes on T4 instead of 64 bytes on T series before. As result BIS instruction prefetches only 32 bytes. Jbb2005 runs show that prefetching 64 bytes is still better on T4 so 2 BIS instructions should be issued.
>>>
>>> BIS can't be use for general prefetching since it may fault. New PrefetchAllocation node was added for allocation prefetching.
>>>
>>> Changed prefetchAlloc_bis parameter from memory to regP.
>>>
>>> Use AllocatePrefetchInstr on Sparc to allow specify what instruction to use for allocation prefetching (0: prefetch write, 1: BIS).
>>>
>>> Added new instructions on Sparc cacheLineAdrX to reduce number of instructions generated for finding next cache line address.
>>>
>>> Added new flag AllocateInstPrefetchLines to specify number of lines to prefetch for instance allocation.
>>>
>>> L1_data_cache_line_size() renamed to prefetch_data_size().
>>
>> src/cpu/x86/vm/x86_32.ad:
>> src/cpu/x86/vm/x86_64.ad:
>>
>> Can you use MacroAssembler instructions to emit the code for the new instructs?
>
> OK.
>
>>
>> src/cpu/sparc/vm/vm_version_sparc.cpp:
>>
>> + if (is_T4()) {
>> + // Double number of prefetched cache lines on T4
>> + // since L2 cache line size is smaller (32 bytes).
>> + if (FLAG_IS_DEFAULT(AllocatePrefetchLines)) {
>> + FLAG_SET_DEFAULT(AllocatePrefetchLines, 6);
>> + }
>> + if (FLAG_IS_DEFAULT(AllocateInstPrefetchLines)) {
>> + FLAG_SET_DEFAULT(AllocateInstPrefetchLines, 2);
>> + }
>> + }
>>
>> Maybe you should use *2 here.
>
> Something like this?:
>
> + if (FLAG_IS_DEFAULT(AllocatePrefetchLines)) {
> + FLAG_SET_DEFAULT(AllocatePrefetchLines, AllocatePrefetchLines*2);
> + }
Yes, that makes more sense to me.
-- Christian
>
> Vladimir
>
>>
>> Otherwise this looks good.
>>
>> -- Christian
More information about the hotspot-compiler-dev
mailing list