Request for reviews (S): 7011839: JSR 292 turn on escape analysis when using invokedynamic
Christian Thalinger
christian.thalinger at oracle.com
Thu Jan 13 04:17:23 PST 2011
On Jan 13, 2011, at 12:00 AM, John Rose wrote:
> On Jan 12, 2011, at 5:46 AM, Christian Thalinger wrote:
>
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~twisti/7011839/webrev.01/
>
> The arg_size computation is very fragile. To start with, the arg_size value should be computed in one place.
>
> As the code is written, arg_base points at the implicit argument to indy, which (I think) is not really on the stack.
>
> I suggest this code:
>
> 234 // compute size of arguments
> 235 int arg_size = target->arg_size();
> if (code == Bytecodes::_invokedynamic) {
> assert(!target->is_static(), "receiver explicit in method");
> arg_size--; // implicit, not really on stack
> }
> 236 if (!target->is_loaded() && code == Bytecodes::_invokestatic) {
> assert(!target->is_static(), "receiver explicit in unloaded method");
> 237 arg_size--;
> 238 }
I like that better. I'd like to keep the invokedynamic check as I couldn't reproduce any escaping case with an invokedynamic call site (using Indify). I think the reason is because they all bail before out as native call sites.
>
> The second assertion is for good measure. The bare "arg_size--" makes me nervous.
We can't use that assert since ciMethod::is_static uses check_is_loaded which asserts on is_loaded.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~twisti/7011839/webrev.02/
-- Christian
More information about the hotspot-compiler-dev
mailing list