review for 7061101: adlc should complain about mixing block and expression forms of ins_encode
Vladimir Kozlov
vladimir.kozlov at oracle.com
Thu Jun 30 11:20:39 PDT 2011
Looks good but I do not understand your comment. Did you mean the check is done
after parsing a ins_encode block instead of before it?
Thanks,
Vladimir
Tom Rodriguez wrote:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~never/7061101
> 12 lines changed: 12 ins; 0 del; 0 mod; 5050 unchg
>
> 7061101: adlc should complain about mixing block and expression forms of ins_encode
> Reviewed-by:
>
> Only one ins_encode should be specified. Tested with bad ad file.
>
More information about the hotspot-compiler-dev
mailing list