review for 7061101: adlc should complain about mixing block and expression forms of ins_encode

[Vladimir Kozlov]

Looks good but I do not understand your comment. Did you mean the check is done 
after parsing a ins_encode block instead of before it?

Thanks,
Vladimir

Tom Rodriguez wrote:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~never/7061101
> 12 lines changed: 12 ins; 0 del; 0 mod; 5050 unchg
> 
> 7061101: adlc should complain about mixing block and expression forms of ins_encode
> Reviewed-by:
> 
> Only one ins_encode should be specified.  Tested with bad ad file.
>