review for 7061101: adlc should complain about mixing block and expression forms of ins_encode

[Vladimir Kozlov]

Yes, could it says something like this?:

// We do this check after block parsing so that we can also catch problems in 
the block

Vladimir

Tom Rodriguez wrote:
> On Jun 30, 2011, at 11:20 AM, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
> 
>> Looks good but I do not understand your comment. Did you mean the check is done after parsing a ins_encode block instead of before it?
> 
> Yes.  Should I change it somehow?
> 
> tom
> 
>> Thanks,
>> Vladimir
>>
>> Tom Rodriguez wrote:
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~never/7061101
>>> 12 lines changed: 12 ins; 0 del; 0 mod; 5050 unchg
>>> 7061101: adlc should complain about mixing block and expression forms of ins_encode
>>> Reviewed-by:
>>> Only one ins_encode should be specified.  Tested with bad ad file.
>