Missing evaluation on bugs 6914095, 6914113, 6933327, 6935994

[Vitaly Davidovich]

On your last one, have you checked to see if it makes a difference? I
believe using partial registers requires a prefix on the op, making the
instruction larger.  Also there are some partial register stalls that can be
triggered.
On Oct 11, 2011 12:00 PM, "Ulf Zibis" <Ulf.Zibis at gmx.de> wrote:

>  Hi,
>
> some time ago I have submitted these bugs:
>
> 6914095 <http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6914095> -
> HotSpot should reuse invariant loop parameter
> 6914113 <http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6914113> - Copy
> int to byte[] in 1 step
> 6933327 <http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6933327> - Use
> shifted addressing modes instead of shift instuctions
> 6935994 <http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6935994> - Use
> as less bits as necessary
>
> I do not see, why they have been closed as "Will Not Fix".
>
> Can someone add content to the 'evaluation' section, or at least explain
> reasons here?
>
> Much thanks,
>
> -Ulf
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-compiler-dev/attachments/20111011/7776e33e/attachment.html