review for 7086585: make Java field injection more flexible

[Vladimir Kozlov]

Can we just have one class FieldDescriptor. Methods and fields are almost the same.

Vladimir

Tom Rodriguez wrote:
> I had a side conversion with Coleen about this and she suggested moving RawFieldDescriptor into it's own file, which I think is a good idea.  She also commented on the confusion between RawFieldDescriptor and fieldDescriptor because of the name similarity.  I had looked at making fieldDescriptor a subclass of RawField at one point and I think I might be able to make that work.  I also think the RawFieldDescriptor name is bad.  How about FieldLayout?  Any opinions?  I had also considered fixing the capitalization of fieldDescriptor.
> 
> tom
> 
> On Sep 8, 2011, at 3:47 PM, John Rose wrote:
> 
>> I've reviewed it.  It's excellent.  Extra thanks for getting rid of instanceKlass::next_offset.  -- John
>>
>> On Sep 8, 2011, at 1:38 PM, Tom Rodriguez wrote:
>>
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~never/7086585
>>> 1577 lines changed: 621 ins; 612 del; 344 mod; 65541 unchg
>>>
>>> 7086585: make Java field injection more flexible
>>> Reviewed-by:
>