review request (L): 7030453: JSR 292 ClassValue.get method is too slow
Christian Thalinger
christian.thalinger at oracle.com
Tue Sep 20 01:02:49 PDT 2011
On Sep 19, 2011, at 11:58 PM, John Rose wrote:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jrose/7030453/webrev.00
src/share/classes/java/lang/ClassValue.java:
233 /** Value stream for for hashCodeForCache. See similar structure in ThreadLocal. */
Two for's.
578 * from the ehad of a non-null run, which would allow them
"ehad"?
Otherwise I think this looks good.
-- Christian
>
> The existing JDK 7 implementation of ClassValue is a place-holder which is defective in several ways:
> - It uses cascaded WeakHashMaps to map from (Class, ClassValue) pairs to values, which is slow.
> - It does not lock the root WeakHashMap, which can cause a race condition the first time a class is encountered.
> - It relies on internal details of WeakHashMap to avoid other race conditions.
>
> The new implementation uses a concurrently readable cache per Class object with entry versioning to manage lookups. It is more correct and scalable.
>
> The tunable parameters CACHE_LOAD_LIMIT and PROBE_LIMIT were chosen by looking at the behavior of artificial workloads. Experience with real workloads will probably lead to further modifications (under new Change Requests). I thought of making them tunable from JVM command line properties, but since no other class in java.lang does this, I held back.
>
> The previous implementation had a store barrier which pushed (via lazySet) pending store values from the user-supplied value before the ClassValue mapping was published. I removed it because it is a false fix for user-caused race conditions. (False because it has the desired effect only on some platforms.) I think it is better to put that issue back onto the user. We still need a memory fence API to give users the right hook for such problems.
>
> There is a package-private change to java.lang.Class, adding two new fields (to the existing 19 fields declared in Class.java).
>
> Although this class is in java.lang, it is part of JSR 292. Therefore the review comments will be collected in mlvm-dev. The review request is CC-ed to hotspot-compiler (where JSR 292 changes are pushed) and core-libs (which is responsible for java.lang).
>
> -- John
More information about the hotspot-compiler-dev
mailing list