Request for review: 7132690 InstanceKlass:_reference_type should be u1 type

Jiangli Zhou jiangli.zhou at oracle.com
Tue Jan 24 14:54:38 PST 2012


Hi Vitaly,

An assert in the setter probably is a good idea. I should have added it 
when making the change. Thanks for the comments!

Thanks,
Jiangli

On 01/24/2012 02:13 PM, Vitaly Davidovich wrote:
>
> Hi Jiangli,
>
> This is probably overly paranoid so feel free to ignore, but should 
> the setter in InstanceKlass assert that the passed in ReferenceType 
> fits into a u1 instead of silently narrowing it? Or change the setter 
> to take a u1 and make caller do the cast? This would prevent someone 
> defining another member of the enum with an explicit value that 
> doesn't fit into u1.  Like I said, paranoia ... :)
>
> Thanks
>
> Sent from my phone
>
> On Jan 24, 2012 3:06 PM, "Jiangli Zhou" <jiangli.zhou at oracle.com 
> <mailto:jiangli.zhou at oracle.com>> wrote:
>
>     Hi,
>
>     Please review the change for 7132690:
>
>     http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jiangli/7132690/webrev.00/
>     <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Ejiangli/7132690/webrev.00/>
>
>     It changes InstanceKlass::_reference_type from ReferenceType to
>     u1. The ReferenceType is defined as an enum with 6 values
>     (src/share/vm/utilities/globalDefinitions.hpp). The change saves
>     4-byte for each class.
>
>     Tested with runThese and ute vm.quick.testlist. Ran jprt.
>
>     Thanks,
>
>     Jiangli
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-compiler-dev/attachments/20120124/d1465722/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the hotspot-compiler-dev mailing list