RFR (S): 7174532: jdk/test/java/lang/Math/WorstCaseTests.java failing on x86
Vladimir Kozlov
vladimir.kozlov at oracle.com
Thu Jun 7 10:45:12 PDT 2012
Roland Westrelin wrote:
>>> Could you rename verify_ctw() to verify_fpu_ctw() since there are
>>> other control
>>> words. Could you explain why it is only problem in VM 32-bit and add
>>> comment?
>>
>> It's 32bit only because on 64 bit the fpu cw it set to extended
>> precision (it seems to be the default for the process?). Do we want to
>> extend verify_fpu_ctw() so it checks the control world on 64 bit as
>> well? It's not checked anywhere else even though I think, in other
>> places than exp and pow, we make assumptions about the control word on
>> 64 bit (that uses the fpu won't trigger exceptions for instance).
>
> It's not that simple. We had the failure on windows-x64 (but not
> solaris-x64 or linux-x64). So something needs to be done on 64 bit as well.
Yes, windows may set different fpu_ctw. May be instead of verification we should
save/restore current control word. I surprise that we don't have problems with
Log and Trigonometric instructions.
An other thing to test is to run 32bit VM with UseSSE=0.
Thanks,
Vladimir
>
> Roland.
More information about the hotspot-compiler-dev
mailing list