C1: fix "assert(has_printable_bci()) failed: _printable_bci should have been set" when using -XX:+PrintCanonicalization
Kris Mok
rednaxelafx at gmail.com
Tue May 29 18:55:24 PDT 2012
Hi Chris,
Thanks for looking at it. Could you sponsor this change, please?
Thanks,
Kris
On 2012-5-30, at 8:16, Christian Thalinger <christian.thalinger at oracle.com> wrote:
> Looks good. Thanks for fixing this. It hit me quite often while working on C1 and I never had time to fix it.
>
> -- Chris
>
> On May 29, 2012, at 12:10 PM, Krystal Mok wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Could I have a couple of review for this patch, please:
>> https://gist.github.com/2829978#file_c1_fix_printable_bci.patch
>>
>> I hit the "assert(has_printable_bci()) failed: _printable_bci should have been
>> set" assertion when I was doing some experiment on C1, and needed to use
>> -XX:+PrintCanonicalization for verification. It turns out that this flag is
>> pretty broken, that quite a few places didn't set printable_bci appropriately.
>>
>> This patch tries to fix the missing printable_bcis.
>> The link also includes a simple example before and after applying this patch.
>>
>> c1_Instructions.hpp:
>> Added set_printable_bci() to Local and Phi's constructor.
>> A "Local" instruction models an incoming argument, which gets its value before
>> method entry, so I'm setting all Local's printable_bci to -1.
>> A reasonable printable_bci for a "Phi" instruction is the same as the start bci
>> of the basic block to which it belongs. I had to use a weird cast to get rid of
>> a "invalid use of incomplete type 'struct BlockBegin' error from GCC.
>>
>> c1_Canonicalizer.cpp:
>> Added a default x->set_printable_bci(bci()) to Canonicalizer::set_canonical().
>> There are quite a few place in Canonicalizer that doesn't specify the
>> printable_bci for the newly created substitution instruction. It's reasonable
>> to just set that to the "current" bci, which is the bci of the instruction to
>> be substituted.
>> Also adjusted the order of a set_bci() call in Canonicalizer::do_If, so that
>> the new code above could pick up the modified bci in set_canonical().
>>
>> Regards,
>> Kris
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-compiler-dev/attachments/20120530/5120a6b6/attachment.html
More information about the hotspot-compiler-dev
mailing list