RFR (M) : 8028587 : [TESTBUG] New tests development for intrisics for basic operators - add, neg, inc, dec, sub, mul
Christian Thalinger
christian.thalinger at oracle.com
Tue Dec 3 12:23:06 PST 2013
- Previous message: RFR (M) : 8028587 : [TESTBUG] New tests development for intrisics for basic operators - add, neg, inc, dec, sub, mul
- Next message: RFR (M) : 8028587 : [TESTBUG] New tests development for intrisics for basic operators - add, neg, inc, dec, sub, mul
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
Could it be a problem that we are using the same log file names for different tests?
37 * @run main Verifier hs_neg.log hs.log
Maybe when we try to run them in parallel? Or are different tests operating in different directories?
On Dec 3, 2013, at 8:41 AM, Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov at oracle.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Please review the patch
>
> New tests for intrinsics were developed. It tests that intrinsics are used where it should, and vice versa.
> Base class CompilerWhiteBoxTest was refactored.
> DecrementExactLongTest.java and IncrementExactLongTest.java fails on amd64 platform. I suppose a product bug (no intrinsic are used where it should be), please check
>
> webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~iignatyev/aaivanov/8028587/webrev.00/ <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Eiignatyev/aaivanov/8028587/webrev.00/>
> jbs: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8028587
> testing: test/compiler/tiered/, test/compiler/whitebox/, test/compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/sanity/
>
> -- Best regards, Anton Ivanov
- Previous message: RFR (M) : 8028587 : [TESTBUG] New tests development for intrisics for basic operators - add, neg, inc, dec, sub, mul
- Next message: RFR (M) : 8028587 : [TESTBUG] New tests development for intrisics for basic operators - add, neg, inc, dec, sub, mul
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
More information about the hotspot-compiler-dev
mailing list