RFR (S) 6518907: cleanup IA64 specific code in Hotspot
Vladimir Kozlov
vladimir.kozlov at oracle.com
Wed Jan 23 15:27:32 PST 2013
This looks good.
Thanks,
Vladimir
On 1/23/13 9:27 AM, Morris Meyer wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I have updated the webrev to remove the AMD case cited by Vladimir
> Kozlov's concern and have re-run the JPRT job.
>
> Thanks,
>
> --mm
>
> JBS - https://jbs.oracle.com/bugs/browse/JDK-6518907
> WEBREV - http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~morris/6518907
>
> On 1/10/13 9:46 AM, Lindenmaier, Goetz wrote:
>>
>> Hi Morris,
>>
>> just remove the amd case if it’s unclear to you.
>>
>> I left it in just in case you find it useful. It probably belongs into
>> a separate change, anyways.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Goetz.
>>
>> *From:*Morris Meyer [mailto:morris.meyer at oracle.com]
>> *Sent:* Donnerstag, 10. Januar 2013 15:36
>> *To:* hotspot-compiler-dev at openjdk.java.net;
>> hotspot_compiler_staff_ww_grp at oracle.com; Lindenmaier, Goetz
>> *Subject:* RFR (S) 6518907: cleanup IA64 specific code in Hotspot
>>
>> Gentlefolk,
>>
>> I have taken what I hope to be the final pass at
>> https://jbs.oracle.com/bugs/browse/JDK-6518907 and incorporated the
>> comments of Goetz Lindenmaier of SAP. Per the HotSpot workflow I have
>> submitted this change successfully to JPRT.
>>
>> Vladimir Kozlov still has a concern that has been unaddressed though,
>> and I would like to get resolution on this point if possible.
>>
>> /One thing concern me is code change in os.cpp for Win64:
>>
>> + // On Windows AMD64 link() does not work as there's no back link
>> on the stack.
>> + #elif (defined(IA64) || defined(AMD64)) && defined(_WIN32)
>>
>> Can someone familiar with Windows confirm if the statement in the
>> comment and code change are correct? /
>>
>> Thanks to all for the previous reviews.
>>
>> --mm
>>
>> JBS - https://jbs.oracle.com/bugs/browse/JDK-6518907
>> WEBREV - http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~morris/6518907
>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Emorris/6518907>
>>
>
More information about the hotspot-compiler-dev
mailing list