RFR(S) 8029302: Performance regression in Math.pow intrinsic
Niclas Adlertz
niclas.adlertz at oracle.com
Thu Apr 17 10:10:29 UTC 2014
Hi all,
webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~adlertz/JDK-8029302/webrev00/
bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8029302
We have a performance regression in Math.pow(x,2) on x64, starting from
7u40.
In 7u40 we replaced a call to SharedRuntime::dpow with an intrinsic for
Math.pow. This is faster in almost all cases, except for Math.pow(x,2).
(See comments in bug report for more info.)
I have added a C2 IR check for Math.pow(x,y) when y == 2, and instead of
calling SharedRuntime::dpow when y == 2, I directly do x * x.
I've changed the generated C2 IR,
>From (psuedo code):
if (x <= 0.0) {
long longy = (long)y;
if ((double)longy == y) { // if y is long
if (y + 1 == y) longy = 0; // huge number: even
result = ((1&longy) == 0)?-DPow(abs(x), y):DPow(abs(x), y);
} else {
result = NaN;
}
} else {
result = DPow(x,y);
}
if (result != result)? {
result = uncommon_trap() or runtime_call();
}
return result;
To (psuedo code):
if (y == 2) {
return x * x;
} else {
if (x <= 0.0) {
long longy = (long)y;
if ((double)longy == y) { // if y is long
if (y + 1 == y) longy = 0; // huge number: even
result = ((1&longy) == 0)?-DPow(abs(x), y):DPow(abs(x), y);
} else {
result = NaN;
}
} else {
result = DPow(x,y);
}
if (result != result)? {
result = uncommon_trap() or runtime_call();
}
return result;
}
I have run jtreg tests in jdk/tests/java/lang (with -server, -Xcomp and
-XX:-TieredCompilation) and run JPRT. No problems encountered.
In particular, java/lang/Math/PowTests passes.
I re-wrote the performance test included in the bug report
(https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/secure/attachment/17807/Main.java)
to a JMH test;
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~adlertz/JDK-8029302/webrev00/MyBenchmark.java
Below are the performance results. The x^2 case is now much faster even
compared to 7u25. (Since we now skip the call to SharedRuntime::dpow)
Numbers from 7u25 b34:
Iteration 1: 46764.923 ops/ms
Iteration 2: 46695.196 ops/ms
Iteration 3: 46647.386 ops/ms
Iteration 4: 46806.854 ops/ms
Iteration 5: 46787.259 ops/ms
Iteration 6: 46788.196 ops/ms
Iteration 7: 46797.500 ops/ms
Iteration 8: 46784.237 ops/ms
Iteration 9: 46782.717 ops/ms
Iteration 10: 46790.678 ops/ms
Iteration 11: 46785.139 ops/ms
Iteration 12: 46798.346 ops/ms
Iteration 13: 46784.595 ops/ms
Iteration 14: 46770.963 ops/ms
Iteration 15: 46789.574 ops/ms
Iteration 16: 46822.452 ops/ms
Iteration 17: 46813.571 ops/ms
Iteration 18: 46747.076 ops/ms
Iteration 19: 46774.254 ops/ms
Iteration 20: 46779.329 ops/ms
Result : 46775.512 ±(99.9%) 34.788 ops/ms
Statistics: (min, avg, max) = (46647.386, 46775.512, 46822.452),
stdev = 40.061
Confidence interval (99.9%): [46740.725, 46810.300]
Numbers from 7u40 b34:
Iteration 1: 9966.052 ops/ms
Iteration 2: 9967.683 ops/ms
Iteration 3: 9967.229 ops/ms
Iteration 4: 9967.266 ops/ms
Iteration 5: 9937.091 ops/ms
Iteration 6: 9966.272 ops/ms
Iteration 7: 9964.679 ops/ms
Iteration 8: 9966.326 ops/ms
Iteration 9: 9964.899 ops/ms
Iteration 10: 9966.920 ops/ms
Iteration 11: 9963.278 ops/ms
Iteration 12: 9967.334 ops/ms
Iteration 13: 9963.351 ops/ms
Iteration 14: 9968.032 ops/ms
Iteration 15: 9964.312 ops/ms
Iteration 16: 9967.080 ops/ms
Iteration 17: 9965.114 ops/ms
Iteration 18: 9966.860 ops/ms
Iteration 19: 9965.375 ops/ms
Iteration 20: 9966.215 ops/ms
Result : 9964.568 ±(99.9%) 5.743 ops/ms
Statistics: (min, avg, max) = (9937.091, 9964.568, 9968.032), stdev =
6.613
Confidence interval (99.9%): [9958.826, 9970.311]
Numbers from http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/hs-comp/hotspot without the
y == 2 check:
Iteration 1: 9966.775 ops/ms
Iteration 2: 9964.514 ops/ms
Iteration 3: 9959.708 ops/ms
Iteration 4: 9965.501 ops/ms
Iteration 5: 9958.087 ops/ms
Iteration 6: 9964.471 ops/ms
Iteration 7: 9964.966 ops/ms
Iteration 8: 9965.132 ops/ms
Iteration 9: 9959.055 ops/ms
Iteration 10: 9964.666 ops/ms
Iteration 11: 9965.649 ops/ms
Iteration 12: 9964.309 ops/ms
Iteration 13: 9966.963 ops/ms
Iteration 14: 9956.511 ops/ms
Iteration 15: 9964.881 ops/ms
Iteration 16: 9966.927 ops/ms
Iteration 17: 9951.054 ops/ms
Iteration 18: 9966.512 ops/ms
Iteration 19: 9967.041 ops/ms
Iteration 20: 9967.198 ops/ms
Result : 9963.496 ±(99.9%) 3.760 ops/ms
Statistics: (min, avg, max) = (9951.054, 9963.496, 9967.198), stdev =
4.330
Confidence interval (99.9%): [9959.736, 9967.256]
Numbers from http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/hs-comp/hotspot with the y
== 2 check:
Iteration 1: 276969.757 ops/ms
Iteration 2: 276809.529 ops/ms
Iteration 3: 276621.258 ops/ms
Iteration 4: 276352.094 ops/ms
Iteration 5: 276922.865 ops/ms
Iteration 6: 276617.189 ops/ms
Iteration 7: 276941.087 ops/ms
Iteration 8: 276215.547 ops/ms
Iteration 9: 276118.685 ops/ms
Iteration 10: 276550.807 ops/ms
Iteration 11: 276773.424 ops/ms
Iteration 12: 276871.125 ops/ms
Iteration 13: 276059.947 ops/ms
Iteration 14: 277109.329 ops/ms
Iteration 15: 276910.165 ops/ms
Iteration 16: 276138.922 ops/ms
Iteration 17: 276083.749 ops/ms
Iteration 18: 276367.479 ops/ms
Iteration 19: 276563.471 ops/ms
Iteration 20: 276022.425 ops/ms
Result : 276550.943 ±(99.9%) 309.657 ops/ms
Statistics: (min, avg, max) = (276022.425, 276550.943, 277109.329),
stdev = 356.601
Confidence interval (99.9%): [276241.286, 276860.600]
More information about the hotspot-compiler-dev
mailing list