RFR(L) 8034198: Cleanup and re-factorize PhaseChaitin::build_ifg_physical()

[Niclas Adlertz]

Hi Rickard,

Thank you for your comments.

http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~adlertz/JDK-8031498/webrev01/

Kind Regards,
Niclas Adlertz

On 2014-01-14 15:03, Rickard Bäckman wrote:
> Just a few comments on the C++ parts. I haven't verified that the logic
> is still the same.
>
> 1) It seems like there are a couple of functions that could be created
> in the new Pressure class to avoid code duplication. One example is the
> check_for_high_pressure_block method.
>
> 2) All places that checks lrg._is_float also check lrg._is_vector. That
> check could be made into a boolean method on the LRG instead. The same
> for is_UP() & mask_size().
>
> 3) To make code more generic the int_pressure and float_pressure
> instances could be passed the INTPRESSURE and FLOATPRESSURE and keep
> those as instance variables.
>
> Good work.
>
> /R
>
> On 01/14, Niclas Adlertz wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> This is a first step to clean up the register allocator in C2. In this change we have divided the very long method build_ifg_physical() into many smaller ones, making it easier to see the steps when building the IFG (and computing the block pressure).
>> We have also cleaned up old comments and improved old code, both by better naming and by simplifying expressions.
>> I personally think that the easiest way to review this change is to have the old and new ifg.cpp side by side, and start from build_ifg_physical().
>> The next step is to create a new class for these methods, isolating them and removing them from PhaseChaitin.
>> WEBREV: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~adlertz/JDK-8031498/webrev00/
>> BUG: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8031498
>>
>> Kind Regards,
>> Niclas Adlertz