[9] RFR (XS): 8036588 : VerifyFieldClosure fails instanceKlass:3133
David Chase
david.r.chase at oracle.com
Fri Jul 11 19:42:08 UTC 2014
Thanks much (and Igor also, and John Rose, who I just now realize I left off the list of reviewers), it is now in the hands of the Meddling Medium.
On 2014-07-11, at 1:50 PM, Vladimir Kozlov <vladimir.kozlov at oracle.com> wrote:
> Looks good.
>
> Vladimir
>
> On 7/11/14 9:34 AM, David Chase wrote:
>> How's this look?
>>
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~drchase/8036588/webrev.01/
>>
>> Retested with jtreg, also (this time) 900 reps of the bug-tickling test with no error.
>>
>> David
>>
>> On 2014-07-09, at 7:02 PM, Vladimir Kozlov <vladimir.kozlov at oracle.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Yes, the return_value_is_used() method is incorrect, it does not take into account that the returned value could be used after deoptimization for reallocated objects.
>>>
>>> return_oop is checked by deoptimization only when EliminateAllocations is true. Only in such case and when objects are reallocated GC can happen during deoptimization.
>>>
>>> The fix will also preserve a return value when it is really not used:
>>>
>>> A a = new A();
>>> (void)foo();
>>> a.f = 1;
>>>
>>> or simple
>>>
>>> (void)foo();
>>>
>>> Which is fine since deoptimization code is not critical for performance.
>>>
>>> return_value_is_used() is used only by this code. I would suggest to rename it to returns_pointer() and copy-paste code from CallNode::returns_pointer() (MachCallNode is not based on CallNode). And use it in the check.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Vladimir
>>>
>>> On 7/8/14 12:13 PM, David Chase wrote:
>>>>
>>>> bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8036588 (closed because only seen in SQE)
>>>>
>>>> webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~drchase/8036588/webrev.00/
>>>>
>>>> cause+fix:
>>>> The root cause is use of the wrong liveness information at deoptimization point.
>>>> The old code uses the optimizer's notion of "live" -- but deoptimization transfers to the
>>>> interpreter and which can (will) manipulate values that are dead to the optimizer.
>>>> The trigger is very tricky -- the following things need to happen:
>>>>
>>>> 1) an object D that will be dead is allocated
>>>> 2) a method M is invoked that returns an object F, to only be stored in a field f of D
>>>> 3) the optimizer eliminates the allocation of D and the storefield into D.f
>>>> 4) deoptimization hits an execution of M; deoptimization reallocates D for the
>>>> interpreter; BUT the reallocation triggers a GC, which would forward F if
>>>> it had been correctly noted as live out of the call to M (but the bug is that it
>>>> was not).
>>>> 5) the interpreter evaluates D.f = F (this succeeds)
>>>> 6) before the frame with D in it exits, ANOTHER garbage collection occurs (or perhaps
>>>> GC was running concurrently in some way) and attempts to trace/copy through
>>>> D and D.f.
>>>> 7) Hilarity ensues.
>>>> 8) For extra giggles, this has only ever been observed with -Xmx=32G (or the corresponding
>>>> -XX:MaxRAMFraction= option) plus of course -XX:+DeoptimizeALot. Also setting
>>>> -XX:DeoptimizeALotInterval=1 increases the failure rate to about 10% of test runs.
>>>> There's some additional missing context, because following this recipe to write a simpler
>>>> test for public consumption did not result in a crashing program.
>>>>
>>>> fix: Use a simpler test for "pointer is live from M" -- if the return type is an object,
>>>> then it is "live", at least for the interpreter.
>>>>
>>>> testing:
>>>> jtreg of runtime, gc, compiler
>>>>
>>>> got to the point where I could see fails often enough for the two tests known to trigger this,
>>>> and after the fix neither test was observed to fail even once, even with hundreds of repetitions.
>>>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-compiler-dev/attachments/20140711/525ab32c/signature.asc>
More information about the hotspot-compiler-dev
mailing list