RFC (S) JDK-8050149: Experimental option to select the instruction sequence for x86 StoreLoad barrier

Aleksey Shipilev aleksey.shipilev at oracle.com
Mon Jul 14 21:53:26 UTC 2014


Sure, no problems with (non-)inclusion.

My question still stands: are there other things I should try to
implement as StoreLoad barrier alternative?

Thanks,
-Aleksey.

On 07/15/2014 01:39 AM, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
> Sorry Aleksey, I don't think this code should be in our sources.
> The patch is small enough to keep it separately when you need it. And
> the problem is not as big as your previous experimental codes.
> 
> Thanks,
> Vladimir
> 
> On 7/14/14 1:01 PM, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
>> Had an off-list discussion with Dave Dice, and figured to throw in a few
>> other options. Let me know if you think something else is missing from
>> this list to try:
>>    http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~shade/8050149/webrev.02/
>>
>> -Aleksey.
>>
>> On 07/14/2014 07:42 PM, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
>>> Hi guys,
>>>
>>> Any comments about pushing something like this into HS?
>>>   https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8050149
>>>   http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~shade/8050149/webrev.01/
>>>
>>> This is a follow up for:
>>>   https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8050147
>>>
>>> I think the actual switch, if any, should happen in JDK-8050147, but I
>>> would like to explore the alternatives here. Performance runs are
>>> underway. Are there any other alternatives for StoreLoad missing?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> -Aleksey.
>>>
>>



More information about the hotspot-compiler-dev mailing list