RFR(XXS): 8043180: SIGSEGV in Events::log_deopt_message

Christian Thalinger christian.thalinger at oracle.com
Thu May 15 14:26:31 UTC 2014


On May 14, 2014, at 10:01 PM, Igor Veresov <igor.veresov at oracle.com> wrote:

> I implemented a functionality mimicking static_assert in C++11 only to notice that we already have a STATIC_ASSERT in debug.hpp.
> Anyways, here is the solution that asserts the proper array sizes statically.

Awesome.  Thanks.

> 
> Webrev:  http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~iveresov/8043180/webrev.02
> 
> igor
> 
> On May 14, 2014, at 6:05 PM, Christian Thalinger <christian.thalinger at oracle.com> wrote:
> 
>> Yeah, something like this.  Better would be to check all entries in a verify method.  Also, can we be sure that undefined entries are initialized to zero on all platforms?
>> 
>> On May 14, 2014, at 5:29 PM, Igor Veresov <igor.veresov at oracle.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Don’t quite know an easy way to that statically, but we can check at runtime:
>>> 
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~iveresov/8043180/webrev.01
>>> 
>>> igor
>>> 
>>> On May 14, 2014, at 5:07 PM, Christian Thalinger <christian.thalinger at oracle.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Can we add verification code to make sure this is the case?
>>>> 
>>>> const char* Deoptimization::_trap_reason_name[Reason_LIMIT] = {
>>>>  // Note:  Keep this in sync. with enum DeoptReason.
>>>> 
>>>> And maybe this one too?
>>>> 
>>>> const char* Deoptimization::_trap_action_name[Action_LIMIT] = {
>>>>  // Note:  Keep this in sync. with enum DeoptAction.
>>>> 
>>>> On May 14, 2014, at 4:49 PM, Igor Veresov <igor.veresov at oracle.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Forgot to name the deopt reason in the aging change. Also fixed some related LogCompilation printing.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~iveresov/8043180/webrev.00/
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> igor
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 



More information about the hotspot-compiler-dev mailing list