[9] RFR(S): 8021775: compiler/8009761/Test8009761.java "Failed: init recursive calls: 51. After deopt 50"
Tobias Hartmann
tobias.hartmann at oracle.com
Fri May 16 11:29:39 UTC 2014
Hi Chris,
thanks for the review.
On 15.05.2014 16:31, Christian Thalinger wrote:
> Presumably:
> *+ WHITE_BOX.enqueueMethodForCompilation(m3, COMP_LEVEL_FULL_OPTIMIZATION);*
> *+ if(!WHITE_BOX.isMethodCompiled(m3)) {*
> *+ throw new RuntimeException(m3 + " not compiled");*
> }
> works because we’re using -XX:-BackgroundCompilation, correct? Maybe
> add a comment there.
Yes, exactly.
> Can we verify via WB API that BackgroundCompilation is off?
Yes, this is for example done in CompilerWhiteBoxTest::getVMOption(...)
to set BACKGROUND_COMPILATION. But I think because we explicitly disable
background compilation in the test header it should not be possible to
re-enable it, right?
Thanks,
Tobias
>
> I’m happy that using the WB API worked.
>
> On May 15, 2014, at 5:44 AM, Tobias Hartmann
> <tobias.hartmann at oracle.com <mailto:tobias.hartmann at oracle.com>> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> please review the following patch for 8021775.
>>
>> *Problem
>> *The compiler test for bug 8009761 checks if the stack size after
>> deoptimization is the same as before by counting the number of
>> possible recursive calls until a StackOverflowException occurs both
>> before and after deoptimization. The test tries to trigger
>> compilation by executing the method multiple times and enforces
>> deoptimization by loading a previously unloaded class.
>>
>> The test fails on multiple platforms.*
>> *Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8021775
>>
>> *Solution**
>> *The test seems to be unstable, as there already occurred several
>> test bugs (see 8010399 and 8012037). Enforcing compilation by
>> executing a method multiple times is indeterministic. We have to make
>> sure that the method is compiled and deoptimized exactly at those
>> points in time where it is needed.
>>
>> I reimplemented the test using the Whitebox API to deterministically
>> trigger compilation and deoptimization.
>> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~anoll/8021775/webrev.00/
>> *
>> **Tests*
>> Executed test on machines where it previously failed (1k runs, no fails).
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Tobias
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-compiler-dev/attachments/20140516/5db9bc12/attachment.html>
More information about the hotspot-compiler-dev
mailing list