RFR(M) 8058744: Crash in C1 OSRed method w/ Unsafe usage
Igor Veresov
igor.veresov at oracle.com
Tue Sep 23 02:44:45 UTC 2014
Thanks, Dave!
igor
> On Sep 22, 2014, at 7:21 PM, David Chase <david.r.chase at oracle.com> wrote:
>
> Looks good to me.
>
>> On 2014-09-22, at 5:19 PM, Igor Veresov <igor.veresov at oracle.com> wrote:
>>
>> Vladimir, Dave,
>>
>> Thanks for the reviews. I’ve added tests for multiplication of the index. And extended the comment that Vladimir suggested.
>> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~iveresov/8058744/webrev.01/
>>
>> igor
>>
>>> On Sep 22, 2014, at 12:27 PM, Vladimir Kozlov <vladimir.kozlov at oracle.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> c1_LIRGenerator.cpp
>>>
>>> Can you extend next comment explaining why you need such difference?:
>>>
>>> // Index is a long register or a int constant
>>>
>>> Otherwise changes are good.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Vladimir
>>>
>>>> On 9/19/14 8:22 PM, Igor Veresov wrote:
>>>> C1 tries to pattern-match argument computation for UnsafeRawOp nodes in order to fold it into an address expression. The original problem is that it had a bug that made it match any shift, instead of only a left shift. But many aspects of this optimization was not entirely correct for 64-bit. It had a bunch of point-fixes in the LIR emitter, but I found a bunch of other problems. I also refactored it a bit, to make it more easier to reason about.
>>>>
>>>> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~iveresov/8058744/webrev.00/
>>>> JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8058744
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> igor
>>>>
>>
>
More information about the hotspot-compiler-dev
mailing list