RFR(L): 8074981 (Integer/FP scalar reduction optimization )
Vitaly Davidovich
vitalyd at gmail.com
Tue Apr 7 19:12:16 UTC 2015
Oh, the motivation is there! :) However, it's not always a quick process
even if everyone's motivated as there may be changes of consequence. As a
small example, java 8 virtual memory charge is significantly higher than
java 7 due to metaspace vs permgen differences. In some cases, this now
requires tweaking java 8 settings in order to keep things running
smoothly. With a big enough codebase, such migrations are never as quick
as one would hope.
At any rate, yes, I meant loop reduction vectorization. It seems like a
fairly self-contained change which should be relatively painless to
backport, hence my inquiry.
On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Vladimir Kozlov <vladimir.kozlov at oracle.com>
wrote:
> We want to motivate people to migrate to new releases :)
> If you mean loop reduction vectorization we can consider it after it is
> tested for some time in jdk9.
>
> Vladimir
>
> On 4/7/15 11:55 AM, Vitaly Davidovich wrote:
>
>> Ok, thanks. That makes sense for avx512 support, but I think having
>> Michael's changes from this thread sooner would be
>> nice as it's quite likely that users are already running java 8 on
>> hardware where this may have benefit. Java 9 is
>> still ways away, and even when it's released, the migration process is
>> not always quick (depending on the nature of
>> major changes). But, if backporting it is messy, it's probably not worth
>> it.
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Vladimir Kozlov <
>> vladimir.kozlov at oracle.com <mailto:vladimir.kozlov at oracle.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Currently it is only jdk9. There are no plans to backport to 8u.
>> The thinking is that we will get jdk9 released when this hardware
>> will be widely available.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Vladimir
>>
>> On 4/7/15 11:30 AM, Vitaly Davidovich wrote:
>>
>> Hi Michael/Vladimir,
>>
>> Out of curiosity, is this change and the out-for-review avx512
>> one going to be (or planned on being) backported
>> to java 8?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 2:07 PM, Berg, Michael C <
>> michael.c.berg at intel.com <mailto:michael.c.berg at intel.com>
>> <mailto:michael.c.berg at intel.__com <mailto:michael.c.berg at intel.
>> com>>> wrote:
>>
>> Please ignore this one its already checked in…____
>>
>> __ __
>>
>> *From:* hotspot-compiler-dev [mailto:hotspot-compiler-dev-_
>> _bounces at openjdk.java.net
>> <mailto:hotspot-compiler-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net>
>> <mailto:hotspot-compiler-dev-__bounces at openjdk.java.net
>> <mailto:hotspot-compiler-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net>>] *On
>> Behalf Of *Berg, Michael C
>> *Sent:* Monday, March 16, 2015 2:18 PM
>> *To:* hotspot-compiler-dev at openjdk.__java.net <mailto:
>> hotspot-compiler-dev at openjdk.java.net>
>> <mailto:hotspot-compiler-dev at __openjdk.java.net <mailto:
>> hotspot-compiler-dev at openjdk.java.net>>
>> *Subject:* RFR(L): 8074981 (Integer/FP scalar reduction
>> optimization )____
>>
>> __ __
>>
>> Hi All,____
>>
>> __ __
>>
>> We would like to contribute the Integer/FP scalar reduction
>> optimization from Intel.____
>>
>> The contribution is referenced as Bug ID 8074981 as a
>> performance enhancement. ____
>>
>> __ __
>>
>> Please review this patch:____
>>
>> Bug-id: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/__browse/JDK-8074981
>> <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8074981> ____
>>
>> webrev: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/
>> __secure/attachment/26101/__webrev.zip
>> <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/secure/attachment/26101/webrev.zip>
>> ____
>>
>> __ __
>>
>> The optimization achieves as much as 2.3x on integer
>> reductions and supports float and double precision
>> optimizations____
>>
>> which also have significant optimization uplift an obey
>> strict fp constraints.____
>>
>> __ __
>>
>> Nils Eliasson has offered to sponsor this patch.____
>>
>> __ __
>>
>> Thanks,____
>>
>> __ __
>>
>> -Michael____
>>
>> __ __
>>
>>
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-compiler-dev/attachments/20150407/d06022e3/attachment.html>
More information about the hotspot-compiler-dev
mailing list