RFR (XXS): 8144521: [JVMCI] JVMCI is built on 32-bit Windows compiler2 and tiered builds

[Vladimir Kozlov]

Okay.

Vladimir

On 12/2/15 11:43 AM, Christian Thalinger wrote:
> Hmm.  Looks like we also need a change like this:
>
> diff -r 8578909eeef4 make/windows/create_obj_files.sh
> --- a/make/windows/create_obj_files.shThu Nov 26 10:38:33 2015 +0000
> +++ b/make/windows/create_obj_files.shWed Dec 02 09:42:23 2015 -1000
> @@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ esac
>
>
>   # Special handling of arch model.
>   case "${Platform_arch_model}" in
> -"x86_32") Src_Files_EXCLUDE="${Src_Files_EXCLUDE} *x86_64*" ;;
> +"x86_32") Src_Files_EXCLUDE="${Src_Files_EXCLUDE}
> ${JVMCI_SPECIFIC_FILES} *x86_64*" ;;
> "x86_64") Src_Files_EXCLUDE="${Src_Files_EXCLUDE} *x86_32*" ;;
>   esac
>
>
>
>> On Dec 2, 2015, at 8:43 AM, Vladimir Kozlov
>> <vladimir.kozlov at oracle.com <mailto:vladimir.kozlov at oracle.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Looks good.
>>
>> Vladimir
>>
>> On 12/2/15 9:58 AM, Christian Thalinger wrote:
>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8144521
>>>
>>> Currently we build JVMCI for 32-bit Windows targets but we shouldn’t.
>>>
>>> diff -r 8578909eeef4 make/windows/makefiles/vm.make
>>> --- a/make/windows/makefiles/vm.makeThu Nov 26 10:38:33 2015 +0000
>>> +++ b/make/windows/makefiles/vm.makeWed Dec 02 07:41:29 2015 -1000
>>> @@ -45,10 +45,16 @@ CXX_FLAGS=$(CXX_FLAGS) /D "COMPILER1" /D
>>>
>>>
>>>  !if "$(Variant)" == "compiler2"
>>>  CXX_FLAGS=$(CXX_FLAGS) /D "COMPILER2"
>>> +!if "$(BUILDARCH)" == "i486"
>>> +CXX_FLAGS=$(CXX_FLAGS) /D INCLUDE_JVMCI=0
>>> +!endif
>>>  !endif
>>>
>>>
>>>  !if "$(Variant)" == "tiered"
>>>  CXX_FLAGS=$(CXX_FLAGS) /D "COMPILER1" /D "COMPILER2"
>>> +!if "$(BUILDARCH)" == "i486"
>>> +CXX_FLAGS=$(CXX_FLAGS) /D INCLUDE_JVMCI=0
>>> +!endif
>>>  !endif
>>>
>>>
>>>  !if "$(BUILDARCH)" == "i486"
>>>
>