RFR (M): 8145688: Update for x86 pow in the math lib
Vladimir Kozlov
vladimir.kozlov at oracle.com
Thu Dec 24 05:11:13 UTC 2015
Looks good. I will push it shortly.
Thanks,
Vladimir
On 12/22/15 4:55 PM, Deshpande, Vivek R wrote:
> Hi Vladimir
>
> Please find the updated webrev for pow at this location for your review.
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~vdeshpande/libm_pow/8145688/webrev.00/
> Bug ID: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8145688
> Thank you.
>
> Regards,
> Vivek
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vladimir Kozlov [mailto:vladimir.kozlov at oracle.com]
> Sent: Monday, December 21, 2015 12:43 PM
> To: Deshpande, Vivek R; hotspot-compiler-dev at openjdk.java.net
> Cc: Viswanathan, Sandhya
> Subject: Re: RFR (M): 8145688: Update for x86 pow in the math lib
>
> Hi Vivek.
>
> Also always use {}:
>
> + if (VM_Version::supports_sse3())
> StubRoutines::_dlog = generate_libmLog();
> + StubRoutines::_dpow = generate_libmPow();
>
> I see fast_log() is using movddup() sse3 instruction. Can you replace it with sse2 equivalent and have conditional code generation depending on sse3 presence instead of limiting it in stubGenerator?
>
> And please add comments to all #endif in macroAssembler_x86_libm.cpp. I forgot to ask that in previous changes.
> When #ifdef block is big we put comment to see what scope is that:
>
> #endif // _LP64
>
> #endif // !_LP64
>
> Thanks,
> Vladimir
>
> On 12/18/15 7:05 PM, Deshpande, Vivek R wrote:
>> Hi all
>>
>> I would like to contribute a patch which optimizes Math.pow() for 64 and 32 bit X86 architecture using Intel LIBM
>> implementation.
>>
>> This passes all the jtreg test in hotspot and PowTests.java in jdk/tests/java/lang/Math.
>>
>> Could you please review and sponsor this patch.
>>
>> Bug-id:
>>
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8145688
>> webrev:
>>
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mcberg/8145688/webrev.02/
>>
>> Thanks and regards,
>>
>> Vivek
>>
More information about the hotspot-compiler-dev
mailing list