RFR(M) 8072383: resolve conflicts between open and closed ports

[Volker Simonis]

Hi Dean,

I've just checked webrev.8u60.01 on Linux/PPC64. It cleanly builds and
runs so thumbs up from me.

Regards,
Volker


On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 5:12 AM, Dean Long <dean.long at oracle.com> wrote:
> Yes, good catch.  I've update the webrev to webrev.8u60.01.  Thanks for the
> review.
>
> dl
>
>
> On 2/18/2015 4:45 PM, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
>>
>> Did you missed to remove #elif ppc_32 in 8u60 changes in
>> src/share/vm/interpreter/templateTable.hpp?
>>
>> Otherwise both versions look good.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Vlaidmir
>>
>> On 2/18/15 4:26 PM, Dean Long wrote:
>>>
>>> Just to avoid confusion, let me clarify that the jdk9 changes below
>>> can't be pushed until after the open aarch64 port is merged into the
>>> main jdk9, as they are based on the staging repo.
>>>
>>> dl
>>>
>>> On 2/18/2015 4:02 PM, Dean Long wrote:
>>>>
>>>> These changes resolve some issues with references to closed ports in
>>>> open hotspot code,
>>>> primarily by removing those references completely.  I have included
>>>> the 8u60 backport
>>>> as well because it won't apply cleanly, and I may push it first
>>>> because the 9 changes are
>>>> blocked by JEP 237: Linux/AArch64 Port.
>>>>
>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dlong/8072383/webrev.8u60.00/
>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dlong/8072383/webrev.9.00/
>>>>
>>>> dl
>>>
>>>
>