RFR(M): Backport of 8069412 : Locks need better debug-printing support

[Christian Thalinger]

Backport to where?  You didn’t say.  Anyway, one review is enough; go ahead.

> On Feb 20, 2015, at 6:48 PM, David Chase <david.r.chase at oracle.com> wrote:
> 
> Do I need a second review for a backport?
> 
> David
> 
> On 2015-02-20, at 7:41 PM, Vladimir Kozlov <vladimir.kozlov at oracle.com> wrote:
> 
>> Good.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Vladimir
>> 
>> On 2/20/15 11:33 AM, David Chase wrote:
>>> I should have done this yesterday, but I did arrange a week of vacation before leaving so I can fix this WFH if necessary.
>>> 
>>> This is a backport of 8069412.
>>> It was not a straight import of the patch.
>>> The reason for the backport is that the bug that inspired the rant that became the bug
>>> is actually an 8u bug, and still needs fixing/investigation.
>>> 
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~drchase/8069412/webrev-backport.00/
>>> 
>>> Functionality of new logging code testing on OSX and Linux.
>>> 
>>> David
>>> 
>