[9] RFR(S): 8075136: Unnecessary sign extension for byte array access
Tobias Hartmann
tobias.hartmann at oracle.com
Fri Mar 13 14:15:18 UTC 2015
Hi,
please review the following patch.
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8075136
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~thartmann/8075136/webrev.00/
Problem:
C2 adds an unnecessary 'movslq' sign extension while compiling a byte array access:
public static byte accessByte(int index) {
return byteArr[index];
}
0x00007f76f4747208: movslq %esi,%r11
0x00007f76f474720b: movsbl 0x10(%r10,%r11,1),%eax
Where the 'movslq' is not necessary because we emit range checks guaranteeing that index %esi is not negative.
For a char array access no such sign extension is created:
public static char accessChar(int index) {
return charArr[index];
}
0x00007fab3916b188: movzwl 0x10(%r10,%rsi,2),%eax
This is because we only have matching rules to fold the corresponding ConvI2LNode in the following case:
match(AddP (AddP (DecodeN reg) (LShiftL (ConvI2L idx) scale)) off);
This applies to charAccess [1] but not to byteAccess [2] because the byte array access does not require a scaling factor.
Solution:
I added the corresponding matching rule to fold the ConvI2LNode.
match(AddP (AddP (DecodeN reg) (ConvI2L idx)) off);
Testing:
- Testcase
- JPRT
Thanks,
Tobias
[1] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/secure/attachment/26108/accessChar.png
[2] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/secure/attachment/26107/accessByte.png
More information about the hotspot-compiler-dev
mailing list