RFR(S): 8136473: failed: no mismatched stores, except on raw memory: StoreB StoreI
Roland Westrelin
roland.westrelin at oracle.com
Wed Sep 16 10:57:45 UTC 2015
Hi Paul,
Thanks for taking a look at this.
> Excuse my ignorance here but is it necessary to check for Op_StoreB in the following?
You’re right. Checking for Op_StoreB is a mistake. I’ll remove it.
Roland.
>
> 2366 #ifdef ASSERT
> 2367 static bool maybe_unaligned_store(Node* n) {
> 2368 StoreNode* st = n->as_Store();
> 2369 return st->Opcode() == Op_StoreL ||
> 2370 st->Opcode() == Op_StoreI ||
> 2371 st->Opcode() == Op_StoreB ||
> 2372 st->Opcode() == Op_StoreC;
> 2373 }
> 2374 #endif
>
> Paul.
>
> On 16 Sep 2015, at 10:35, Roland Westrelin <roland.westrelin at oracle.com> wrote:
>
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~roland/8136473/webrev.00/
>>
>> The problem here is that intrinsified Unsafe.Put*Unaligned methods may cause mismatched stores to be on the same memory slice.
>>
>> Roland.
>
More information about the hotspot-compiler-dev
mailing list