RFR: 8164358: [JVMCI] expose Hotspot intrinsics and HotSpotIntrinsicCandidate info to JVMCI compilers
Christian Thalinger
cthalinger at twitter.com
Tue Aug 23 22:44:02 UTC 2016
> On Aug 23, 2016, at 11:41 AM, Doug Simon <doug.simon at oracle.com> wrote:
>
> While trying to push this, we hit a C compiler crash in read_configuration(). In the hope that it’s related to the expansion of the VM_INTRINSICS_DO macro, I’ve refactored this code into a separate method:
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dnsimon/8164358v3/ <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dnsimon/8164358v3/>
+ VMIntrinsicMethod::set_id(vmIntrinsicMethod, vmIntrinsics::id); \
+ vmIntrinsics->obj_at_put(index++, vmIntrinsicMethod()); \
+ }
I was talking about the spaces at the beginning of the line. Should’ve asked for a new webrev ;-)
>
> -Doug
>
>> On 22 Aug 2016, at 22:31, Doug Simon <doug.simon at oracle.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On 22 Aug 2016, at 18:58, Christian Thalinger <cthalinger at twitter.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Aug 19, 2016, at 11:39 AM, Doug Simon <doug.simon at oracle.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 19 Aug 2016, at 23:18, Christian Thalinger <cthalinger at twitter.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Aug 19, 2016, at 5:01 AM, Doug Simon <doug.simon at oracle.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I changed it to only try reuse the declaringClass string (which has the most overlap):
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dnsimon/8164358v2/
>>>>>
>>>>> Looks good. The only comment I have is about:
>>>>> VMField::klass()->initialize(thread);
>>>>> VMFlag::klass()->initialize(thread);
>>>>>
>>>>> + VMIntrinsicMethod::klass()->initialize(thread);
>>>>> We should use CHECK_NULL here too. Sure, it's very unlikely these fail but better safe than sorry.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for catching this! I don’t think I’ll ever develop the eye you have for consistent exception propagation in VM code. I’ve spent too much time spent in a language where this is automatic ;-)
>>>
>>> I hope I’ll forget soon… :-)
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I’ve made the change in the v2 web rev.
>>>
>>> Yes, this looks good. One thing I noticed is somehow indent is off here:
>>> + VMIntrinsicMethod::set_descriptor(vmIntrinsicMethod, sig_str()); \
>>> + VMIntrinsicMethod::set_id(vmIntrinsicMethod, vmIntrinsics::id); \
>>> + vmIntrinsics->obj_at_put(index++, vmIntrinsicMethod()); \
>>> + }
>>> No need for a new webrev.
>>
>> Ok - thanks for another detailed review!
>>
>> -Doug
>>
>>>>>>> On 18 Aug 2016, at 23:59, Doug Simon <doug.simon at oracle.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 18 Aug 2016, at 20:01, Christian Thalinger <cthalinger at twitter.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> src/jdk.vm.ci/share/classes/jdk.vm.ci.hotspot/src/jdk/vm/ci/hotspot/CompilerToVM.java
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> * [String name, Long value, ...] vmAddresses,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> + * [String name, Long value, ...] vmAddresses,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> * VMFlag[] vmFlags
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> + * VMIntrinsicMethod[] vmIntrinsics
>>>>>>>> Looks like a copy-paste problem.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Oops! Will fix.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> src/share/vm/jvmci/jvmciCompilerToVM.cpp
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Why do we have to do the prev_##var##_sid == sid dance? I guess it’s some optimization but does it really matter?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It cuts down the number Strings allocated by about 35% (900 vs 582). With full string interning, the savings is around 55% (415) but the overhead of using a HashSet from VM code is prohibitive. I won’t argue strongly that it makes a big difference but since the one-element cache (per VMIntrinsicMethod string field) is fast and cheap, I don’t see why not to use it. The alternative code would look something like this:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> objArrayHandle vmIntrinsics = oopFactory::new_objArray(VMIntrinsicMethod::klass(), (vmIntrinsics::ID_LIMIT - 1), CHECK_NULL);
>>>>>>> int index = 0;
>>>>>>> #define VM_SYMBOL_TO_STRING(s) java_lang_String::create_from_symbol(vmSymbols::symbol_at(vmSymbols::VM_SYMBOL_ENUM_NAME(s)), THREAD)
>>>>>>> #define VM_INTRINSIC_INFO(id, kls, name, sig, ignore_fcode) { \
>>>>>>> instanceHandle vmIntrinsicMethod = InstanceKlass::cast(VMIntrinsicMethod::klass())->allocate_instance_handle(CHECK_NULL); \
>>>>>>> Handle kls_string = VM_SYMBOL_TO_STRING(kls); \
>>>>>>> Handle name_string = VM_SYMBOL_TO_STRING(name); \
>>>>>>> Handle sig_string = VM_SYMBOL_TO_STRING(sig); \
>>>>>>> VMIntrinsicMethod::set_declaringClass(vmIntrinsicMethod, kls_string()); \
>>>>>>> VMIntrinsicMethod::set_name(vmIntrinsicMethod, name_string()); \
>>>>>>> VMIntrinsicMethod::set_descriptor(vmIntrinsicMethod, sig_string()); \
>>>>>>> VMIntrinsicMethod::set_id(vmIntrinsicMethod, vmIntrinsics::id); \
>>>>>>> vmIntrinsics->obj_at_put(index++, vmIntrinsicMethod()); \
>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> VM_INTRINSICS_DO(VM_INTRINSIC_INFO, VM_SYMBOL_IGNORE, VM_SYMBOL_IGNORE, VM_SYMBOL_IGNORE, VM_ALIAS_IGNORE)
>>>>>>> #undef VM_SYMBOL_TO_STRING
>>>>>>> #undef VM_INTRINSIC_INFO
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Better?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -Doug
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If we don’t have to do that I would prefer is that macro would be a method (or two).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Aug 18, 2016, at 6:50 AM, Doug Simon <doug.simon at oracle.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Please review this change which allows JVMCI compilers to see what intrinsics are defined by the VM and which methods have been annotated by HotSpotIntrisicCandidate.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8164358
>>>>>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dnsimon/8164358/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> -Doug
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-compiler-dev/attachments/20160823/72b3928e/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the hotspot-compiler-dev
mailing list