RFR(XS) 8161292: [JVMCI] missing test files from 8159368

[Vladimir Kozlov]

Good.

Thanks,
Vladimir

On 7/18/16 10:42 AM, Tom Rodriguez wrote:
> The native calling convention was broken on windows and this also
> exposed general problems with the AMD64TestAssembler.  Windows native
> calling only ever uses registers for the first 4 arguments so logic had
> to be added to AMD64HotSpotRegisterConfig to support this.  Additionally
> the test assembler wasn’t computing the location of the integer stack
> slots properly and the argument loading needs to use scratch registers.
>  I expanded the test to have cases that pass 32 of float, double, int
> and long to make sure that extreme cases are exercised on all platforms.
>  This properly passes JPRT.
>
> The changes relative to the original review
> are http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~never/8161292.diff/webrev/ and the full
> webrev is http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~never/8161292.v2/webrev/.
>
> tom
>
>> On Jul 13, 2016, at 4:44 PM, Tom Rodriguez <tom.rodriguez at oracle.com
>> <mailto:tom.rodriguez at oracle.com>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Jul 13, 2016, at 12:19 PM, Tom Rodriguez <tom.rodriguez at oracle.com
>>> <mailto:tom.rodriguez at oracle.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Jul 13, 2016, at 11:49 AM, Christian Thalinger
>>>> <cthalinger at twitter.com <mailto:cthalinger at twitter.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Looks good.  How did it pass JPRT?
>>>
>>> Thanks.  It’s a completely new test.
>>>
>>> tom
>>
>> Sending it through JPRT exposed a bug where the native calling
>> convention isn’t properly described on windows.  There are only 4 XMM
>> registers used there.  Since the native calling convention is really
>> only used for things which take at most 2 floats, we never noticed.
>>  I’m fixing that now and will send out a new webrev in a bit.
>>
>> tom
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On Jul 13, 2016, at 5:55 AM, Tom Rodriguez
>>>>> <tom.rodriguez at oracle.com <mailto:tom.rodriguez at oracle.com>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~never/8161292/webrev
>>>>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~never/8161292/webrev>
>>>>>
>>>>> I missed some test files file the push for 8159368.  They are
>>>>> unchanged from the review.  Can I get a quick review?
>>>>>
>>>>> tom
>>>>
>>>
>>
>