Safepoint timeout in scimark?

[Vladimir Kozlov]

Such If node can be folded with CLE later so you will get SP after it 
again. Also if it is not folded it will prevent some loop optimizations. 
I would say not converting such loop into Counted may give the same 
performance.

thanks,
Vladimir

On 7/19/16 9:51 AM, Roland Westrelin wrote:
>
> Hi Vladimir,
>
>> I am worry that moving safepoint before CLE will be correct in all cases
>> since JVMS could be different.
>
> In my patch, I guarded the safepoint before the CLE with a test that
> guarantees we will take the backedge of the loop. Shouldn't that be
> sufficient?
>
> Roland.
>