RFR(M): 8166561: [s390] Adaptions needed for s390 port in C1 and C2.

[Lindenmaier, Goetz]

Hi Vladimir, 

I removed the line, and I also adapted the copyrights:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~goetz/wr16/8166561-basic_C1C2_s390/webrev.03/

Best regards,
  Goetz.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vladimir Kozlov [mailto:vladimir.kozlov at oracle.com]
> Sent: Donnerstag, 6. Oktober 2016 18:59
> To: Lindenmaier, Goetz <goetz.lindenmaier at sap.com>; hotspot-compiler-
> dev at openjdk.java.net
> Subject: Re: RFR(M): 8166561: [s390] Adaptions needed for s390 port in C1
> and C2.
> 
> Sorry, I forgot to say that you should not call
> CompileBroker::handle_full_code_cache() in output.cpp. It is called
> during maybe_expand_to_ensure_remaining() call.
> 
> Thanks,
> Vladimir
> 
> On 10/5/16 11:03 PM, Lindenmaier, Goetz wrote:
> > Hi Vladimir,
> >
> > I made the corresponding change. New webrev:
> > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~goetz/wr16/8166561-
> basic_C1C2_s390/webrev.02/
> >
> > Thanks also for pushing 8166562!
> >
> > Best regards,
> >   Goetz.
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Vladimir Kozlov [mailto:vladimir.kozlov at oracle.com]
> >> Sent: Mittwoch, 5. Oktober 2016 19:36
> >> To: Lindenmaier, Goetz <goetz.lindenmaier at sap.com>; hotspot-
> compiler-
> >> dev at openjdk.java.net
> >> Subject: Re: RFR(M): 8166561: [s390] Adaptions needed for s390 port in C1
> >> and C2.
> >>
> >> Can you make IdealizeClearArrayNode diagnostic_pd flag? It could be
> >> useful on other platforms to switch off optimization.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Vladimir
> >>
> >> On 10/5/16 8:39 AM, Lindenmaier, Goetz wrote:
> >>> Hi
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Please review this change needed for the s390 port.
> >>>
> >>> It adds all the shared configurations and some minor adaptions needed
> >>>
> >>> in the C1 and C2 compilers:
> >>>
> >>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~goetz/wr16/8166561-
> >> basic_C1C2_s390/webrev.01/
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Best regards,
> >>>
> >>>   Goetz.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>