[10] RFR: 8191813: compiler/runtime/SpreadNullArg.java fails in tier1

Daniel D. Daugherty daniel.daugherty at oracle.com
Fri Nov 24 15:26:08 UTC 2017


On 11/24/17 6:16 AM, Rahul Raghavan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please review the following fix proposal for 8191813.
>
> webrev - http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rraghavan/8191813/webrev.00/

test/hotspot/jtreg/compiler/runtime/SpreadNullArg.java
     No comments.

So this style of call:

     mh_spreadInvoker.invokeExact(mh_spread_target, (Object[]) null);

was changed from throwing IllegalArgumentException due to the "null"
parameter to throwing NullPointerException. You've updated the test
cleanly to switch from one exception to the other.

Thumbs up! I believe this patch qualifies as trivial and does not
need to wait for 24 hours. I leave it up to you whether you wait
for a Compiler team member review also.

Dan


>
>
> jbs - https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8191813
>
> -- reported issue - After the latest sync from jdk/jdk the test 
> SpreadNullArg started to fail in tier1 on all platforms.
>
> -- Found this SpreadNullArg.java failure Caused after JDK-8157246 fix.
> jbs - https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8157246.
> 'MHs.arrayLength, arrayElementGetter/Setter, arrayConstructor need to 
> specify invocation-time behavior'.
> changeset - http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk/rev/76519338df34
>
> - So now with 8157246 fix, if method handle is invoked with a null 
> array reference, NullPointerException will be thrown. (Not 
> IllegalArgumentException)
>
> - So above fix proposal in SpreadNullArg.java to expect 
> NullPointerException after 8157246 changes.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Rahul



More information about the hotspot-compiler-dev mailing list