[10] (S) RFR 8184361: AOT lib at jdk/lib/libjava.base-coop.so seems to override -XX:AOTLibrary=

dean.long at oracle.com dean.long at oracle.com
Wed Nov 29 17:42:59 UTC 2017


On 11/28/17 6:38 PM, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:

> Thank you, Dean
>
> On 11/28/17 6:19 PM, dean.long at oracle.com wrote:
>> On 11/28/17 5:55 PM, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
>>
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kvn/8184361/webrev.00/
>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8184361
>>>
>>> Change priority in which AOT libraries are loaded.
>>>
>>> First, load libraries specified by AOTLibrary. And then, well known 
>>> libraries from JAVA installation directory. Don't load a library if 
>>> an other library with the same name is already loaded.
>>>
>>> It will allow do quick experiments with modified libraries.
>>>
>>> Manual testing and AOT jtreg tests.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Vladimir
>>
>> It looks OK, but it imposes an undocumented? naming convention that 
>> must be followed.  If have use dir1/foo.so and dir2/foo.so, then only 
>> first will get loaded, so I need to use unique file names.  And if I 
>> (accidentally) name it lib<module>.so, then the system version won't 
>> get loaded, so users must know the naming convention to avoid 
>> conflicts.  If users need to following a naming convention to avoid 
>> conflicts, then it might make sense to deprecate AOTLibrary and 
>> instead have something more convenient for multiple libraries, like a 
>> AOTLibraryPath search path option.
>
> Yes, you should use different names if you are loading AOT libraries 
> with different classes.
> Allowing to load libraries with the same name was oversight. It cause 
> at least one bug JDK-8167526 which you fixed.
>
> Search path has the same problem, I think. You don't know what will be 
> loaded first.
>
> Names of well-known AOT libraries are documented in AOT JEP just 
> before "Steps to generate and use an AOT library for the java.base 
> module" section:
>
> http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/295
>
>>
>> I wonder if we should always print the warning, instead of putting it 
>> under PrintAOT.
>
> This is what we do in other cases with AOT - most AOT messages are 
> under PrintAOT.
>

OK, sounds good.

dl

> Thanks,
> Vladimir
>
>>
>> dl



More information about the hotspot-compiler-dev mailing list