RFR(S) 8166750: profiling handles statically bindable call sites differently than the interpreter

[Igor Veresov]

Thanks!
igor

> On Oct 25, 2017, at 4:04 PM, Vladimir Kozlov <vladimir.kozlov at oracle.com> wrote:
> 
> Looks good.
> 
> Thanks,
> Vladimir
> 
> On 10/25/17 3:16 PM, Igor Veresov wrote:
>> Sure. I’ve updated the webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~iveresov/8166750/webrev.02/
>> Also added a comment in HotSpotMethodData.java per Doug’s request.
>> igor
>>> On Oct 25, 2017, at 10:29 AM, Vladimir Kozlov <vladimir.kozlov at oracle.com <mailto:vladimir.kozlov at oracle.com>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Igor
>>> 
>>> Can you factor out checks into boolean function in shared place? May be move some surrounding code into it too - I see the same code on all platforms.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Vladimir
>>> 
>>> On 10/24/17 8:52 PM, Igor Veresov wrote:
>>>> This a fix from Tom that I ported to all architectures and the new repo structure. While that fix doesn’t not solve the problem of the interpreter-C1 profiling style discrepancy completely it speeds up profiling of the statically bindable call sites and we’d like to push that. I also added a bit of a code to JVMCI to do the profile fix up analogous to what happens in CI.
>>>> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~iveresov/8166750/webrev.01/
>>>> JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8166750
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> igor