RFR(S): 8201367: assert(current != first_mem) failed: corrupted memory graph in superword code
Vladimir Kozlov
vladimir.kozlov at oracle.com
Thu Apr 26 16:12:17 UTC 2018
Yes, this is better.
And you can initialize last_mem with first_mem without going through
indirect loads again.
Thanks,
Vladimir
On 4/26/18 1:57 AM, Roland Westrelin wrote:
>
> Hi Vladimir,
>
> Thanks for looking at this.
>
>> The logic looks fine to me. But is it optimal? Can we use
>> dependence_graph constructed before this code?
>
> I looked at the dependence graph but couldn't find a way it would help.
>
> What about this instead?
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~roland/8201367/webrev.01/
>
> Roland.
>
More information about the hotspot-compiler-dev
mailing list