RFR: 8215500: ICRefillVerifierMark does not set the provided verfier as current
Erik Österlund
erik.osterlund at oracle.com
Tue Dec 18 09:40:57 UTC 2018
Hi Per,
Thanks for the review. Will do that name change before pushing as suggested.
/Erik
On 2018-12-17 22:17, Per Liden wrote:
>
>
> On 12/17/2018 08:16 PM, Erik Österlund wrote:
>> Hi Per,
>>
>> On 2018-12-17 19:12, Per Liden wrote:
>>> On 12/17/2018 06:57 PM, Erik Österlund wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> ICRefillVerifierMark::ICRefillVerifierMark sets "this" as the
>>>> current verifier, as opposed to the verifier passed in. That is wrong.
>>>>
>>>> Bug:
>>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8215500
>>>>
>>>> Webrev:
>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~eosterlund/8215500/webrev.00/
>>>
>>> Wow, one of those "how could this have ever worked?" ;) Should we
>>> forward declare ICRefillVerifier in thread.hpp to get some better
>>> type safety here and avoid the reinterpret_cast in icBuffer.cpp?
>>
>> Sure. New webrev:
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~eosterlund/8215500/webrev.01/
>
> Looks good! However, I couldn't help by noticing that it seem like the
> "{set_,_,}missed_ic_stub_refill_mark" members in Thread should be called
> "missed_ic_stub_refill_verifier" now, right? Or maybe just
> "{set_,_,}ic_refill_verifier" to match the class name. Anyway, you
> decide, either way I don't need to see a new webrev.
>
> cheers,
> Per
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> /Erik
>>
>>> cheers,
>>> Per
More information about the hotspot-compiler-dev
mailing list