[10] RFR(S) 8194992: Null pointer dereference in MultiNode::proj_out related to loopexit()

dean.long at oracle.com dean.long at oracle.com
Thu Jan 18 17:52:30 UTC 2018


On 1/18/18 9:51 AM, Tobias Hartmann wrote:

> Hi Dean,
>
> On 18.01.2018 18:49, dean.long at oracle.com wrote:
>> The Parfait instructions say that it must be run on a slowdebug build.  I think Parfait used to have problems with
>> recognizing all the hotspot "exit" functions, so maybe that was the reason guarantee() was used.
> Okay, thanks for clarifying!
>
> The changes look good to me.

Thanks!

dl

> Best regards,
> Tobias
>> On 1/18/18 1:42 AM, Tobias Hartmann wrote:
>>> Hi Dean,
>>>
>>> I have a general question about your fixes: Isn't Parfait also used to analyze product builds that won't have the assert
>>> code? The guarantees you removed in loopTransform.cpp were added in the past to make Parfait happy (JDK-8009181).
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Tobias
>>>
>>> On 18.01.2018 04:30, dean.long at oracle.com wrote:
>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dlong/8194992/webrev/
>>>>
>>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8194992
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This fix is uses the same approach as 8194988.  I split loopexit() into loopexit_or_null(), which can return NULL, and
>>>> loopexit() which cannot.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> dl
>>>>



More information about the hotspot-compiler-dev mailing list