RFR(S): 8212673: jtreg/applications/runthese/RunThese30M.java fails in C2 with "assert(!had_error) failed: bad dominance"

Tobias Hartmann tobias.hartmann at oracle.com
Wed Nov 7 16:21:14 UTC 2018


It's https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8213487

Best regards,
Tobias

On 07.11.18 17:10, Per Liden wrote:
> Ah, I think you're right. Something that just want into jdk/jdk (JDK-8213414 or JDK-8213347) seem to
> have caused this.
> 
> Thanks,
> Per
> 
> On 11/07/2018 05:02 PM, Tobias Hartmann wrote:
>> I think these are unrelated failures (probably due to JDK-8213414), I also see them in our CI.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Tobias
>>
>> On 07.11.18 16:52, Per Liden wrote:
>>> Hi Roland,
>>>
>>> On 10/24/2018 11:14 AM, Roland Westrelin wrote:
>>>>
>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~roland/8212673/webrev.00/
>>>
>>> Heads up. I grabbed this patch and ran it through tier1-3 on linux-x64 and got 125 test failures
>>> (all of them in tier3).
>>>
>>> Here are a handful of the tests that failed:
>>>
>>> compiler/types/TestMeetIncompatibleInterfaceArrays.java
>>> compiler/types/TestMeetIncompatibleInterfaceArrays.java
>>> runtime/verifier/PrimIntArray.java
>>> runtime/verifier/popTopTests/PopDupTop.java
>>> runtime/stackMapCheck/StackMapCheck.java
>>> runtime/verifier/PrimIntArray.java
>>> runtime/verifier/popTopTests/PopDupTop.java
>>> runtime/stackMapCheck/StackMapCheck.java
>>> compiler/types/TestMeetIncompatibleInterfaceArrays.java
>>> compiler/types/TestMeetIncompatibleInterfaceArrays.java
>>> runtime/logging/ClassInitializationTest.java
>>> runtime/handlerInTry/LoadHandlerInTry.java
>>> compiler/types/TestMeetIncompatibleInterfaceArrays.java
>>> ...
>>>
>>> All these failed on the same assert. Like this:
>>>
>>> # To suppress the following error report, specify this argument
>>> # after -XX: or in .hotspotrc:  SuppressErrorAt=/allocation.cpp:218
>>> #
>>> # A fatal error has been detected by the Java Runtime Environment:
>>> #
>>> #  Internal Error
>>> (/scratch/opt/mach5/mesos/work_dir/slaves/2dd962d0-8988-479b-a804-57ab764ada59-S1324/frameworks/1735e8a2-a1db-478c-8104-60c8b0af87dd-0196/executors/73c9153d-50f8-4618-9677-367c32a5c956/runs/e70e9adb-5acd-44a1-89da-0244974d5dd2/workspace/open/src/hotspot/share/memory/allocation.cpp:218),
>>>
>>> pid=22982, tid=22997
>>> #  assert(~(_allocation_t[0] | allocation_mask) != (uintptr_t)this || !is_type_set()) failed:
>>> embedded or stack only, this(0x00007f6ee803d870) type 1 a[0]=(0xffff809117fc278e)
>>> a[1]=(0x00007f6ee803d881)
>>> #
>>> # JRE version: Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (12.0) (fastdebug build
>>> 12-internal+0-2018-11-07-1353526.per.liden.zgc)
>>> # Java VM: Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (fastdebug
>>> 12-internal+0-2018-11-07-1353526.per.liden.zgc, mixed mode, sharing, tiered, compressed oops,
>>> parallel gc, linux-amd64)
>>> # Core dump will be written. Default location:
>>> /scratch/opt/mach5/mesos/work_dir/slaves/2dd962d0-8988-479b-a804-57ab764ada59-S1300/frameworks/1735e8a2-a1db-478c-8104-60c8b0af87dd-0196/executors/9506a9ad-7631-4642-aec7-8cb47a50b26b/runs/45c78358-d71d-48fd-a0dc-f901e68def30/testOutput/test-support/jtreg_open_test_hotspot_jtreg_hotspot_runtime/scratch/1/core.22982
>>>
>>>
>>> #
>>> # An error report file with more information is saved as:
>>> #
>>> /scratch/opt/mach5/mesos/work_dir/slaves/2dd962d0-8988-479b-a804-57ab764ada59-S1300/frameworks/1735e8a2-a1db-478c-8104-60c8b0af87dd-0196/executors/9506a9ad-7631-4642-aec7-8cb47a50b26b/runs/45c78358-d71d-48fd-a0dc-f901e68def30/testOutput/test-support/jtreg_open_test_hotspot_jtreg_hotspot_runtime/scratch/1/hs_err_pid22982.log
>>>
>>>
>>> #
>>> # If you would like to submit a bug report, please visit:
>>> #   http://bugreport.java.com/bugreport/crash.jsp
>>> #
>>>
>>>
>>> It doesn't seem to matter which GC is used. I don't have time to dig deeper right now, but I'll
>>> double check and re-run some of these later tonight, just to make sure I didn't mess something up on
>>> my side. Maybe you can see if any of these failures are reproducible on your side.
>>>
>>> cheers,
>>> Per
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> In PhiNode::Ideal():
>>>>
>>>>     Node* uin = unique_input(phase, false);
>>>>     if (uin == NULL && can_reshape) {
>>>>       uncasted = true;
>>>>       uin = unique_input(phase, true);
>>>>     }
>>>>
>>>> can find a unique input by looking trough cast. But code below:
>>>>
>>>>         if ((is_loop && !uin->eqv_uncast(in(LoopNode::EntryControl))) ||
>>>>             (!is_loop && is_unsafe_data_reference(uin))) {
>>>>
>>>> eqv_uncast can fail because it looks through casts and load barriers if
>>>> the unique input is a load barrier. This then causes a valid input to a
>>>> Phi to be set to top.
>>>>
>>>> I propose to backout JDK-8212603 and add calls to step_over_gc_barrier()
>>>> to locking optimization code only instead (which was the motivation for
>>>> JDK-8212603).
>>>>
>>>> Roland.
>>>>


More information about the hotspot-compiler-dev mailing list