RFR(XS): 8213779: Loop opts anti dependent store detection should ignore uncommon trap calls

[Vladimir Kozlov]

On 11/14/18 12:23 AM, Roland Westrelin wrote:
> 
>> Looks good.
>>
>> Based on history there was CheckTypeNode subclass of IfNode which had more inputs.
> 
> Thanks for the review and the background. Can this be considered trivial
> and pushed with a single review?

Yes, one review is okay but please run submit testing before push if you did not do it already.

Vladimir

> 
> Roland.
>