RFR(M): 8213528: fp registers should not need to be saved around a CallLeafNoFP

[Vladimir Kozlov]

On 11/14/18 12:29 AM, Roland Westrelin wrote:
> 
> 
>> Save/restore XMM registers in a wrapper stub is perfectly fine with me. May be we should name such calls differently -
>> NO_FP is misleading.
> 
> Rather than a different node type, what about a field in CallLeafNode
> (bool _preserve_fp_registers;)? I would then leave both CallLeafNode and
> CallLeafNoFpNode alone for now and the patch would simply test for
> _preserve_fp_registers in lcm.cpp?

Sounds good. Is lcm.cpp only place where we do such check (in addition to code in .ad files)?

Vladimir

> 
> Roland.
>