RFR(M): 8213528: fp registers should not need to be saved around a CallLeafNoFP

Roland Westrelin rwestrel at redhat.com
Fri Nov 30 16:11:18 UTC 2018

Previous message: RFR(M): 8213528: fp registers should not need to be saved around a CallLeafNoFP
Next message: RFR(M): 8213528: fp registers should not need to be saved around a CallLeafNoFP
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

FTR, we are withdrawing this RFR. Further experiments with a recent code
base showed that this brings only minimal improvement now.

Roland.

Previous message: RFR(M): 8213528: fp registers should not need to be saved around a CallLeafNoFP
Next message: RFR(M): 8213528: fp registers should not need to be saved around a CallLeafNoFP
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the hotspot-compiler-dev mailing list