RFR(S): 8209544: AES encrypt performance regression in jdk11b11

[Andrew Haley]

On 09/06/2018 02:20 PM, Dmitry Chuyko wrote:
> On 09/06/2018 04:10 PM, Roland Westrelin wrote:
>>> Yes. Here is how it looks like:
>>> ...................................
>> That does seem like a pretty minimal difference and not a reason not to
>> push that change. What do you think?
> I agree, it looks like something we should investigate in aarch64 port.

mkay, but how, exactly? Is it simply the case that Intel is improved
so the patch is good, even if AArch64 regresses?

-- 
Andrew Haley
Java Platform Lead Engineer
Red Hat UK Ltd. <https://www.redhat.com>
EAC8 43EB D3EF DB98 CC77 2FAD A5CD 6035 332F A671