[13] RFR (XS): 8202952: C2: Unexpected dead nodes after matching

Vladimir Kozlov vladimir.kozlov at oracle.com
Tue Jan 22 20:42:11 UTC 2019


Got it. Good.

thanks,
Vladimir

On 1/22/19 12:08 PM, Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
> 
> On 22/01/2019 11:54, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
>> The fix is different from what we discussed.
>> Can you explain how it helps?
> 
> We discussed adding AddP case to _shared_nodes.
> 
> Proposed fix achieves similar result with a different approach:
> 
>    * Matcher::clone_address_expressions() marks problematic AddP as shared (based on constant value);
> 
>    * DFA() doesn't construct duplicated State for inner AddP (since it's marked as shared);
> 
>    * Matcher doesn't need to materialize duplicated mach nodes, since it matches inner AddP separately;
> 
> Best regards,
> Vladimir Ivanov
> 
>> On 1/22/19 11:05 AM, Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~vlivanov/8202952/webrev.00/
>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8202952
>>>
>>> The crash happens when PhaseCFG encounters a dead MachNode in the graph.
>>> The problematic node is a leftover from matching of an instruction with a duplicated memory operand (sarI_mem_CL [1] 
>>> in that particular case).
>>>
>>> Address has the following shape [2]:
>>>    AddP (AddP DecodeN (LShiftL ConvI2L ConI)) ConL
>>>
>>> It could be subsumed into complex addressing expression, but the constant is too large (doesn't fit into immL32). So, 
>>> matcher has to compute inner address expression separately and put it into a register.
>>>
>>> Since memory operand is duplicated, 2 copies are materialized during matching, but as part of ::Expand() one of the 
>>> copies is eliminated, thus leaving a dead mach node in the IR (for the address expression).
>>>
>>> The fix is to adjust Matcher::clone_address_expressions() to avoid cloning inner AddP when constant offset is too large.
>>>
>>> Testing: hs-precheckin-comp, hs-tier1, hs-tier2
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Vladimir Ivanov
>>>
>>> [1] instruct sarI_mem_CL(memory dst, rcx_RegI shift, rFlagsReg cr)
>>> %{
>>>    match(Set dst (StoreI dst (RShiftI (LoadI dst) shift)));
>>>
>>>
>>> [2]
>>>   o347 AddP  === _ o2181 o1768 o1769  [[o349 o371 ]]
>>>      o1768 AddP  === _ o2181 o2181 o1765  [[o347 ]]
>>>          o2181 DecodeN === _ o287  [[o1768 o1768 o327 o347 o327 ]] #int[int:>=0]:NotNull:exact *
>>>          o1765 LShiftL === _ o1761 o60  [[o1768 ]]
>>>              o1761 ConvI2L === _ o1741  [[o1765 ]] #long:maxint-51..maxint-48
>>>              o60   ConI  === o0  [[o61 o1765 o1434 o2013 o1631 o2017 o1808  60 ]]  #int:2
>>>      o1769 ConL  === o0  [[o347 ]]  #long:-8589932784


More information about the hotspot-compiler-dev mailing list