[13] RFR (S): 8059241: C2: Excessive RemoveUseless passes during incremental inlining
Aleksey Shipilev
shade at redhat.com
Sat Jan 26 10:08:53 UTC 2019
On 1/26/19 12:34 AM, Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
> I did some measurements with earlier version [1] and didn't notice any regressions:
> BEFORE AFTER
> Box2DBench 50.439 ± 5.644 43.549 ± 2.520 ms/op
> CryptoBench 6.972 ± 0.137 7.019 ± 0.163 ms/op
> DeltaBlueBench 630.607 ± 6.784 644.160 ± 11.296 us/op
> EarleyBoyerBench 20.284 ± 0.415 20.735 ± 0.378 ms/op
> GbemuBench 58.731 ± 2.852 59.245 ± 3.936 ms/op
> NavierStokesBench 6.606 ± 0.042 6.628 ± 0.057 ms/op
> PdfJSBench 83.063 ± 4.480 78.909 ± 2.268 ms/op
> RaytraceBench 3583.622 ± 40.646 3578.562 ± 45.962 us/op
> RegexpBench 70.060 ± 2.538 72.189 ± 2.651 ms/op
> RichardsBench 233.414 ± 2.990 233.116 ± 5.641 us/op
> SplayBench 956.145 ± 37.547 917.133 ± 37.245 us/op
>
> Let me know about your findings.
Oh no, if you did Octane/JMH runs, this is already okay. I would struggle with plain Octane runner
separately.
-Aleksey
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-compiler-dev/attachments/20190126/65965d8c/signature.asc>
More information about the hotspot-compiler-dev
mailing list